[Qgis-developer] OSX packages

[chris marx]

I'd just like to second the notion of an easier install for mac, an
installer would be great, and I'd really like it if, just like the osgeo
installer, you could specify that you want the oracle support installed too-

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, William Kyngesburye <woklist at kyngchaos.com>
wrote:

> It should be possible, there is a build option to do that, though I
> haven't fully tested it.  (GSL is bundled, I keep forgetting to ask someone
> to fix the QGIS donwload page to remove that requirement.)
>
> You would miss out on GDAL driver plugins, especially those with
> non-GPL-compatible licenses.  They would still need separate installers,
> and I would have to figure out where to install them.  Probably a QGIS
> application support mirroring GDAL's, though it could share use of the
> normal GDAL plugins.  Not in the application, not proper.
>
> Required python modules are another thing that would be needed to be
> bundled.  But users would still need to separately install other Python
> modules needed by any QGIS plugins they installed.
>
> About the installer vs. drag-n-drop: the installer is needed for compiling
> the python scripts and creating the browser alias.  Drag-n-drop is not the
> only "normal" installation method on OS X.  Installers are just as "normal".
>
> Besides sharing GDAL with other software, GDAL and the Python modules are
> very useful on their own, and I hear from many people who do use them
> separately from and alongside QGIS.
>
> One thing I'm not sure about, if QGIS knows to specify the GDAL resource
> dir (datums, projections, ...) if it's not at the default location
> programmed into GDAL.  And that goes for not only GDAL as a library, but
> the GDAL tools and GDAL python.  (and other libraries that have resource
> dirs like PROJ and geotiff)
>
> I have considered an alternative: putting the current GDAL and Python
> module installers on the QGIS installer disk image.  It's one download, but
> users would still have to install each of them in the right order.
>
> The problem with this, and another problem with the bundling method, is
> that when any of the pieces change, I have to package the whole thing again
> (and with bundling that means saving the compiled source and running the
> make install again to do the bundling, and hope that something doesn't
> trigger a recompile).  And the user has to download the whole monster again
> and install it.
>
> On Nov 6, 2014, at 3:20 AM, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder if we could offer "all in one" OSX QGIS packages in the future?
> >
> > The average OSX user is afraid of installing separate frameworks - even
> if its very simple. The normal install way on OSX is just drag and drop to
> the applications folder.
> >
> > Is there a particular technical reason why we cannot include GDAL/GSL
> into the QGIS package? I know that it wouldn't be shared with other FOSSGIS
> software then - but would this matter a lot?
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
> -----
> William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com>
> http://www.kyngchaos.com/
>
> [Trillian]  What are you supposed to do WITH a maniacally depressed robot?
>
> [Marvin]  You think you have problems?  What are you supposed to do if you
> ARE a maniacally depressed robot?  No, don't try and answer, I'm 50,000
> times more intelligent than you and even I don't know the answer...
>
> - HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20141106/88feb3a0/attachment.html>