[Qgis-developer] QGIS 3.0?

[Nathan Woodrow]

Personally I think we should still do 2.8, LTR it, and then we can do 3.0
for the next release.

Breaking the API again without a LTR in place makes me nervous as the 2.0
API really wasn't that long ago.

- Nathan

On Sat Nov 08 2014 at 4:11:34 PM Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm just wondering - given a few large changes coming up, including:
> - qt5 support, possibly breaking plugins
> - potential composer redesign, breaking api
> - geometry rework, where an api break would result in a better
> foundation moving forward
>
> ... is it worth exploring the idea of making the next release QGIS 3.0
> and breaking API? I know the original plan was for 3.0 to coincide
> with python 3 support, but that doesn't appear to be anywhere on the
> horizon yet.
>
> Nyall
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20141108/c226f627/attachment.html>