[Qgis-developer] Stability (2.8 LTS) vs development (3.0), a proposed way forward

[Martin Dobias]

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Luca Manganelli <luca76 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Geo DrinX <geodrinx at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes yes yes.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> but also +999     :)
>
> And why not +9999 ?

Seeing this I can't resist to quote a bit of PEP-10 [1]

"""
+1 I like it
+0 I don't care, but go ahead
-0 I don't care, so why bother?
-1 I hate it

You may occasionally see wild flashes of enthusiasm (either for or
against) with vote scores like +2, +1000, or -1000.  These aren't
really valued much beyond the above scores, but it's nice to see
people get excited about such geeky stuff.
"""

Cheers
Martin


[1] http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0010/