[Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Salvatore Larosa]

+1 for QEP from me, I really like the idea of an unique and personal tag.

All the Best,
-SL

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Alexander Bruy <alexander.bruy at gmail.com> wrote:
> +0 for QEP from me
>
> 2014-09-02 16:01 GMT+03:00 Larry Shaffer <larrys at dakotacarto.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), specifically
>> for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think the QGIS project
>> is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the process, since there
>> is some disagreement.
>>
>> QEP or RFC?
>>
>> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>>
>> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not
>> confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them is
>> fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows a
>> renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process.
>>
>> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
>> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Larry Shaffer
>> Dakota Cartography
>> Black Hills, South Dakota
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> --
> Alexander Bruy
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Salvatore Larosa
linkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/larosasalvatore
twitter: @lrssvt
skype: s.larosa
IRC: lrssvt on freenode