[Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Vincent Picavet]

Hi,
I was more in favor of RFC at the beginning, but QEP will ease search on 
search engine.

So +1 for QEP.

Vincent

Le mercredi 3 septembre 2014 03:56:48, Martin Dobias a écrit :
> +1 for QEP
> 
> Martin
> 
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Larry Shaffer <larrys at dakotacarto.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
> > specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think
> > the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the
> > process, since there is some disagreement.
> > 
> > QEP or RFC?
> > 
> > +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
> > 
> > I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not
> > confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them
> > is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows
> > a renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process.
> > 
> > Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
> > popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Larry Shaffer
> > Dakota Cartography
> > Black Hills, South Dakota
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer