[Qgis-developer] Project quality discussion

[Tim Sutton]

Hi

> On 06 Nov 2015, at 19:40, Alex M <tech_dev at wildintellect.com> wrote:
> 

8< ————— snip ------------

> If a company wants something that makes it into Core, it should be
> pre-approved via a QEP. The fallback should be a plugin.
> 
> I caution the use of $ to directly influence the QEP review and Pull
> Request reviews. Some sort of bounty pool, allowing core devs to get a
> stipend for clearing big reviews might be an option. So companies can
> contribute to QGIS and that money can go to expedite all QEP and Code
> reviews, but not a specific one.


Agreed -We need salaried QGIS.ORG staff that can review these things independently of who it comes from or if / how they have financed QGIS.

Regards

Tim



> Thanks for bringing up good things for discussion.
> -Alex
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer




Tim Sutton
QGIS Project Steering Committee Member
tim at qgis.org




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20151108/b782dfa0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-1.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 9882 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20151108/b782dfa0/attachment.tiff>