[Qgis-developer] New QEP process

Anita Graser anitagraser at gmx.at
Sun Nov 15 02:33:13 PST 2015


On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I will assume from the lack of response from this email that most are
> happy with the proposed workflow?
>


​Thanks Nathan! Sounds good to me.

Best wishes,
Anita​





>
> If not let me know soon or else I will continue with it as planned above.
>
> Regards,
> Nathan
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> So I have been thinking about the QEP process, because yes the current
>> process is not good and way to slow for how we work.  To streamline I have
>> talked to a few people and this is the notes so far.
>>
>> - Open for at least one week
>> - QEP process should be fast and evolve into a PR but also not cut back
>> on details.
>> - PR can also be opened at the same time - however not recommend if
>> something is still in planning stage and changing, or chance of rejection
>> e.g don't update all the code headers with MIT and then open a QEP because
>> it wouldn't happen.
>> - Code based QEPs require at least 2 +1's
>> - Requires +1 from maintainer of that area of code e.g Nyall for composer
>> work, Martin for rendering thread
>> - Project QEPs require majority PSC vote
>> - May be extended upon request (eg, i'm on holidays but have feedback)
>> - May be extended if required
>> - Others can assign themselves as interested e.g I might be interested in
>> Processing but can't comment on the code.  Mainly just to provide feedback.
>> - If no maintainer for a area of code, requires at least 2 +1s from core
>> devs
>>
>> The tl;dr version:
>>
>> - Project QEP: PSC vote
>> - Code QEP: min +2 (+1 from maintainer plus +1 from other)
>> - Keep it semi formal but quick.
>>
>> The code maintainer for the different areas will need to be updated
>> however I'm sure we can handle that.
>>
>> How does that sound to everyone?
>>
>> I would like to make it fast but also give us time to review changes that
>> will affect the project.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20151115/b4259acc/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list