[Qgis-developer] Release schedule discussion - again
strk at keybit.net
Tue Oct 13 00:47:04 PDT 2015
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:21:59AM +1100, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> valid. But that said, my honest thoughts are that the BEST way to
> ensure stable, regression-free releases is to extend the test suite.
> My plea to sponsors:
> If you're funding QGIS development work and the contract doesn't
> mention something like "we will totally soak this work in unit tests"
> then rip up the contract and run. (Or ask them nicely to revise the
> contract to include this ;) ) If you're funding work and it's not
> being accompanied by unit tests then you aren't getting what you paid
> for, and you'll be forever forced to test your funded features in
> every new release manually for regressions...
More information about the Qgis-developer