[Qgis-developer] QEP - Proposal for QGIS 3.0 after 2.14

[Nathan Woodrow]

I suspect we don't really have any options.  It has to happen at some point
and it's better to at least have a plan then just drop the bomb and hope it
all works out.

I think something that might be good is if we can get PyQt5 setup for QGIS
we can access how much effort it's going to be and work though one plugin
as team to learn all the traps before scaring anyone with the details.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:

> Yes, that's why I'm worried.
> Many authors will fix them, but I'm not convinced all of them will. I fear
> many users will stick to older qgis versions because of that.
> All the best.
>
> Il 21 ottobre 2015 08:28:20 CEST, Tom Chadwin <tom.chadwin at nnpa.org.uk>
> ha scritto:
>>
>> That's a lot of plugins - over 150, minus a handful of deprecated ones.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QEP-Proposal-for-QGIS-3-0-after-2-14-tp5231556p5231572.html
>> Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>>
> --
> Paolo Cavallini
> http://www.faunalia.eu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20151021/27fefea4/attachment-0001.html>