[Qgis-developer] Improving ftools geoprocessing tools

Matthias Kuhn matthias at opengis.ch
Thu Oct 22 08:15:41 PDT 2015


Would (some of) these datasets be suitable to include in unit tests for
It would be very interesting to have these available for this purpose.


On 10/22/2015 05:07 PM, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Victor Olaya <volayaf at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The issue here is about the lousy performances (and even wrong
>>> results) of the native qgis vector geoprocessing tools. I think we all
>>> agree that qgis should have a few (at least the most commonly used)
>>> ones, without depending on any 3rd party software.
>> I fully agree on that
>> Do we have any benchmark or list of those algorithms with very bad
>> performance or that give wrong results? I don't think that all of them
>> behave so badly, so it would be good to have more detail about where
>> we should be focusing our efforts in this
> great, so I would suggest try underestand why the tools here
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/fTools/tools/doGeoprocessing.py
> are so bad with such "problematic" datasets (that I can easily
> provide). If is possible to do something
> then take João company offer use it to improve the situation, then we
> can decide with calm were to put the
> shortcuts :)
> cheers!
> -- G --
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20151022/feb6289e/attachment.sig>

More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list