[Qgis-developer] Adding new provider for QGIS
Alessandro Pasotti
apasotti at gmail.com
Tue Jan 26 23:27:41 PST 2016
2016-01-26 23:43 GMT+01:00 David Adler <dadler at adtechgeospatial.com>:
> I'm afraid I'm relatively new to Git - I have mostly used SVN with GDAL
> and GeoTools.
>
> I created a fork off github.com/qgis/qgis onto my github.com/dwadler/qgis
> environment.
>
> The branch is set to master.
>
> When I clicked on New Pull Request, it said they were the same and didn't
> do anything. Your note stated that this will kick off the automated test
> suite.
>
> Should I be doing a git clone to my development system, creating a new
> branch, putting the new/modified code in it, commit and push back to
> github? Then do the pull?
>
Yes, exactly.
1. clone QGIS master into your own git repo
2. create a branch for example 'db2-provider'
3. checkout your branch 'db2-provider'
4. add your code to 'db2-provider'
5. commit and push to 'db2-provider'
6. make the pull request from 'db2-provider' to QGIS master
>
> I didn't think I could do a push to github - wouldn't this attempt to
> update the QGIS master? It isn't clear how Travis gets in the loop.
>
Whenever you make a pull request from your branch to qgis master, Travis
starts compiling and runs the test suite.
>
> For testing, wouldn't QGIS need a live connection to a DB2 database?
>
Yes, you can have a look to Tavis scripts, for example, here is how the
postgres test DB is prepared:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/ci/travis/linux/before_script.sh
Kind regards.
--
Alessandro Pasotti
w3: www.itopen.it
2016-01-26 23:43 GMT+01:00 David Adler <dadler at adtechgeospatial.com>:
> I'm afraid I'm relatively new to Git - I have mostly used SVN with GDAL
> and GeoTools.
>
> I created a fork off github.com/qgis/qgis onto my github.com/dwadler/qgis
> environment.
>
> The branch is set to master.
>
> When I clicked on New Pull Request, it said they were the same and didn't
> do anything. Your note stated that this will kick off the automated test
> suite.
>
> Should I be doing a git clone to my development system, creating a new
> branch, putting the new/modified code in it, commit and push back to
> github? Then do the pull?
>
> I didn't think I could do a push to github - wouldn't this attempt to
> update the QGIS master? It isn't clear how Travis gets in the loop.
>
> For testing, wouldn't QGIS need a live connection to a DB2 database?
>
> Please excuse the novice questions.
>
> David
>
>
>
> On 1/25/2016 6:14 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
> Hi David, (and cc'ing back in qgis-dev)
>
> When you open a pull request against the main QGIS master repo, the
> automated test suite ( <https://travis-ci.org/qgis/QGIS>
> https://travis-ci.org/qgis/QGIS) will kick in and run a test build and
> run all the existing unit tests to avoid regressions. It will also run some
> "meta" tests, checking code quality and adherence to the code standards.
>
> So that's the first step - open your PR against QGIS master (not against
> your fork), and see how this goes. Then you basically keep revising your
> branch and pushing to github and for each new push Travis will retest until
> you get a green light.
>
> The next step is adding new tests to cover your work. Without tests it
> *will* break in some future QGIS release, so that's why testing is
> mandatory for something like this. The provider test also runs a bunch of
> complex cases against each provider to ensure that they correctly handle a
> bunch of corner cases, so it will help ensure that your provider is well
> behaved and stable.
>
> Here's some other provider tests which are good models to copy from:
>
>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/tests/src/python/test_provider_shapefile.py
>
>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/tests/src/python/test_provider_spatialite.py
>
> (Note that both also implement additional tests specific to that provider,
> eg testRepack for shapefiles). The ms-sql provider test is a good example
> of a minimal test, which only implements the things required for the
> generic provider test (although you could also omit the
> enableCompiler/disableComplier methods if you haven't implemented an
> expression compiler for db2 yet). Then you'll also need to include relevant
> test data - see
> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/tree/master/tests/testdata/provider>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/tree/master/tests/testdata/provider for
> what's expected in the test files, eg
> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/tests/testdata/provider/testdata_mssql.sql>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/tests/testdata/provider/testdata_mssql.sql
> .
>
> Hope that helps!
>
> Nyall
>
>
>
> On 26 Jan 2016 10:05, "David Adler" < <dadler at adtechgeospatial.com>
> dadler at adtechgeospatial.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not clear on what the "automated CI" is or how one runs is.
> >
> > We did a fork and pull to our fork to do the development.
> >
> > I'm still a bit hazy on setting up and running the tests. Does a
> database need to be operational in order to run the tests?
> test_provider_mssql.py doesn't look like it does much.
> >
> >
> > On 1/25/2016 4:24 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 26 Jan 2016 07:57, "David Adler" < <dadler at adtechgeospatial.com>
> dadler at adtechgeospatial.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > We would like to add a DB2 provider to QGIS so that QGIS users can
> access spatial tables on DB2 for LUW and DB2 for z/OS.
> >> >
> >> > We have implemented and tested much of this based on an existing
> database provider.
> >> >
> >> > What is the mechanism to have this reviewed and approved?
> >>
> >> Open a pull request on github, and let the automated CI run its checks
> over the code.
> >>
> >> Tips to get things reviewed/merged faster:
> >> - Make sure all your API additions are correctly documented
> >> - Include unit tests. At a minimum a new vector provider needs a test
> which inherits from ProviderTestCase. See
> tests/src/python/test_provider_mssql.py for an example. This ensures that
> the provider behaves consistently with what QGIS expects from a vector data
> provider.
> >>
> >> Nyall
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> >> > Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >> > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
> >
> > This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
> > www.avast.com
>
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> This
> email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
--
Alessandro Pasotti
w3: www.itopen.it
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20160127/33ec938b/attachment.html>
More information about the Qgis-developer
mailing list