[Qgis-developer] Idea: mandatory PR for all 3.0 api breaks?

[Nyall Dawson]

I'd like to raise an idea for discussion: should we *require* that all
3.0 API breaks are introduced via a PR?

Advantages I'd see are:
1. wider discussion about the nicest way the new/modified API could work
2. allows for discussion about whether the documentation for the API
break is sufficient for plugin developers

Disadvantages:
1. More work
2. Given that there's going to be a lot of breaks, it could slow
development down.

I'm a +0 on this.

Nyall