[Qgis-developer] [Qgis-community-team] Moving the install instructions to a more sexy, visible, coherent and translatable page in qgis.org

DelazJ delazj at gmail.com
Wed May 18 03:49:16 PDT 2016


Hi,

2016-05-18 8:24 GMT+02:00 Tim Sutton <tim at kartoza.com>:

> Hi
>
>
> After rereading the thread I think I am +1 for moving to RST in the QGIS
> Docs repo with the following thinking:
>
> Is the Doc repo a better candidate for this (if we get the go!) than QGIS
website?

* QGIS Website is always translatable, so can easily show the most recent
procedure in different languages. It also provides a chapter on development
steps, might be worth having this beside.
* Using website, we have a unique hyperlink (to use in our communication if
needed) instead of having to update it after each released doc
* testing doc (which in the ideal world, is related to master) is not to be
translated
* not all QGIS versions are/will be documented: the last doc provided is
2.8. The next should be 2.14 (btw, still looking for volunteers to write it
- around 80 issues remaining and not the least) but when will be the
release?



> * all the good stuff Junior mentioned like translatability, visibility etc.
> * when we hit release freeze we could copy the latest output from sphinx
> (maybe generated as plain text file?) to INSTALL.txt and remove the sources
> for the install docs from the QGIS code tree. That way the QGIS sources
> always contain the current notes for that release and the doc sources
> contain only the most recent procedure.
> * we could add a note in the docs sources saying ‘these instructions are
> for the current state of the develop branch only, for version specific
> install procedures, please see the INSTALL.txt in the source tree for that
> release’
>
> +1 though the copy would be from the website repo (as suggested above)


> I think that workflow is not too much different from the current system.
> Of course someone needs to volunteer to get all the processes above into
> place :-P
>
> I'd RSTed the install doc and opened a pull request at
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/343/files. Might need correction.
It's the content on April 15th. Don't however know the steps to keep this
up to date nor automate some changes (like date of doc).

Regards,
Harrissou



2016-05-18 8:49 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. <jef at norbit.de>:

> Hi Tim,
>
> On Wed, 18. May 2016 at 08:24:05 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
> > @Jürgen regarding your comments below, I used to use apt-get build-dep
> too
> > but I actually like the explicit package list your script generates more
> in
> > some ways because it is deterministic compared to build-dep which will
> only
> > reflect the deps from the current latest package in apt sources.
>
> The dependencies of the latest automatic nightly are probably more
> up-to-date
> than the list from the latest manual INSTALL update run.
>
>
> Jürgen
>
> --
> Jürgen E. Fischer           norBIT GmbH             Tel.
> +49-4931-918175-31
> Dipl.-Inf. (FH)             Rheinstraße 13          Fax.
> +49-4931-918175-50
> Software Engineer           D-26506 Norden
> http://www.norbit.de
> QGIS release manager (PSC)  Germany                    IRC: jef on FreeNode
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-community-team mailing list for organizing community resources such
> as documentation, translation etc..
> Qgis-community-team at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20160518/eaf39813/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list