<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi again<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 20.01.20 11:45, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pergler@gmail.com">pergler@gmail.com</a>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:004001d5cf7e$b7ea9250$27bfb6f0$@gmail.com">
<p class="MsoNormal">I installed 3.10.2 (OSGeo4W installer) over
the weekend, and I’m running into a bunch of issues (zoom
crashes - <a href="https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/33902"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/33902</a>;
corrupted output from georeferencer, custom CRS that has lost
its USER:xxxxx label). Before I try to pick them off one by one,
is it possible the right dependencies didn’t make it into the
install?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My About… screen says I have GDAL 3.0.2 and
PROJ “6.2.1 dated Nov 1”, which makes me suspicious.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Apparently, the first Windows builds of release 3.10.2 still
included older versions of GDAL/OGR and PROJ. See <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2020-January/thread.html#59948">this
thread</a> on this list.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2020-January/060001.html">https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2020-January/060001.html</a>
seems to indicate that 3.10.2 was re-released some time before
2020-01-23 16:16 PST (2020-01-24 00:16 UTC). So <b>if you
downloaded QGIS 3.10.2 before that, you should re-download it</b>
to not suffer from the bugs of the old library versions.</p>
<p>I don't know why the 3.10.2 was re-released instead of releasing
3.10.3 with the upgraded library versions as suggested in that
mailing list thread (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2020-January/059983.html">here</a>
and <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2020-January/059986.html">here</a>).
Releasing it as 3.10.3 would have made it more clear to users,
which version they actually downloaded and would have been more in
line with semantic versioning concepts. (I dunno whether QGIS aims
to follow semantic versioning conventions.)<br>
</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br>
Raphael<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>