<div dir="auto"><div>Nice!</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">With sip code being python, I had just patched my system sip with David's diff, until 6.15 was included in Debian testing.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best,</div><div dir="auto">Stefanos</div><div dir="auto"><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jun 9, 2026, 4:46 PM Even Rouault <<a href="mailto:even.rouault@spatialys.com">even.rouault@spatialys.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<p><br>
</p>
<div>Le 09/06/2026 à 15:19, Stefanos Natsis
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi all,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Am I the only QGIS dev highly frustrated by the bottleneck
of sip-build <br>
when building QGIS? Can we do something (funding upstream?)
to improve that?</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>I used to be quite frustrated when sip4 support was
dropped, as sip-build times were really terrible with sip
6 at the time.</div>
<div>After David's fixes in Oct/Nov 2025 though, things are
back to normal. With sip-tools v6.15+ I don't think
sip-build is a bottleneck any more for me.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks for the hint. That does improve things (sip-build time)
indeed. For posterity, I managed to use it without altering too
much my build env with:</p>
<p>python3 -m venv sip_venv<br>
source sip_venv/bin/activate<br>
pip install sip PyQt-builder<br>
cmake -USIP_BUILD_EXECUTABLE ..</p>
<br>
<pre cols="72">--
<a href="http://www.spatialys.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://www.spatialys.com</a>
My software is free, but my time generally not.</pre>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div></div>