[Qgis-psc] Fwd: Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS plugin repo [was: Value Tool]

Marco Hugentobler marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch
Fri Jun 18 01:26:20 PDT 2010


Hi all

My preference is separate svn /trac. Like this, it becomes clearer those 
plugins are not officially maintained by the QGIS dev team. I'm not expert in 
svn/trac permission questions, but the add-on team probably would have more 
flexibility in the organisation too.

Regards,
Marco

Am Freitag, 18. Juni 2010, um 09.14:38 schrieb Paolo Cavallini:
> Hi all.
> Should we vote on this? Any further comment?
> All the best.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> I think we need the PSC to weigh in on what they would prefer in terms
> of single or separate svn.
> 
> A permissions master, aka account approver would be ok. I think that's
> how trac-hacks does it. We would need to some sort of plugin contributor
> agreement I think and clear limits on what is/is not allowed (ie only
> plugins with certain licensing would be permitted).
> 
> FYI, I also now have a test script that is working for bundling up a
> directory of files with exclusion filters into a zip ready for upload.
> I'm now working to turn it into a plugin, but the backend was designed
> to work separate from the interface so it can easily be reused inside
> trac. I'll be happy to post it as soon as we've got the repo going, in
> the meantime if anyone wants to see the code let me know and I'll come
> up with something.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


-- 
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
Webereistrasse 66, 8134 Adliswil, Switzerland
marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee



More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list