[Qgis-psc] Motion: move to GIT and Redmine

[Tim Sutton]

Hi Guys

Ok so based on the feedback, it seems its at least ok for everyone if
I poll the wider community and try to see if the move to GIT will be
widely acceptible.

@Marco agreed yes its probably better to wait till after the HF before
we migrate.

I will remove redmine from the discussion and keep things focussed to
GIT for now (though I guess someone will inevitably raise the point).

Regards

Tim

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it> wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 07/04/2011 alle 22.27 +0200, Marco Hugentobler ha
> scritto:
>> Wouldn't it be better to concentrate on bugfixing and 1.7 release for now and
>> do a migration after 1.7 is out? I'm just concerned that too many new things
>> at once could create unforeseen problems.
>
> Hi all.
> I agree that releasing 1.7 after polishing is a major objective, and we
> can postpone migration to immediately after release. However, I think we
> should profit from the HF to discuss in detail our roadmap as for our
> internet infrastructure, for core, plugins and more.
> All the best.
> --
> http://www.faunalia.it/pc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>



-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==============================================
Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==============================================