[Qgis-psc] Re: Qgis-psc Digest, Vol 45, Issue 3

[Marco Bernasocchi]

Btw Tim since we are discussing about pulling back code into master, i've a
growing patch against current master that adds a lot of very nice #ifdef
ANDROID, gps support, a compass plugin, and some more bugfixes. It has no
conglicts since i pull master more than daily.
Do you want me to send a pull request?
Ciao
 On Feb 7, 2012 5:59 PM, <qgis-psc-request at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Send Qgis-psc mailing list submissions to
>        qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        qgis-psc-request at lists.osgeo.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        qgis-psc-owner at lists.osgeo.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Qgis-psc digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Re: Qgis-psc Digest, Vol 45, Issue 1 (Tim Sutton)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:09:24 +0200
> From: Tim Sutton <tim at linfiniti.com>
> Subject: Re: [Qgis-psc] Re: Qgis-psc Digest, Vol 45, Issue 1
> To: Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
> Cc: qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> Message-ID:
>        <CADOrBxNY2sEE+fSfmyhyw4VOLOuWVFikUXxtTq5_5gz6_D4bnA at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> HI
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
> wrote:
> > Il 05/02/2012 22:33, Marco Bernasocchi ha scritto:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >> I just wanted to say that I think the program is a very good thing, at
> >> least it was for me. so you should definetly apply to it again.
> >>
> >> luckly, not all code is unused :)
> >
> >
> > Hi Marco.
> > GSoC is certainly a Very Good Thing, I did not want to detract from it.
> I'm
> > just concerned we wasted some occasions, and we could maximize its
> > effectiveness.
> >
>
> Yes although there will be cases where we cannot accept code into core
> (e.g. the student wasnt able to produce something worthwhile), it
> would be nice to have the anticipation that all gsoc work is targetted
> at improving and incorporating into the core QGIS otherwise the code
> may be forgotten and never make it into production.
>
> I would still love to see the processing framework formalised as part
> of QGIS (with no saga etc deps out of the box but the ability to
> include saga, grass etc as it is available on the system).
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
>
> > Ideas?
> > All the best.
> >
> > --
> > Paolo Cavallini
> > See: http://www.faunalia.it/pc
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> --
> Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
> ==============================================
> Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
>  * QGIS programming services
>  * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
>  * FOSS Consulting Services
> Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
> ==============================================
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
> End of Qgis-psc Digest, Vol 45, Issue 3
> ***************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20120208/24fc16f2/attachment.html>