[Qgis-psc] Infrastructure

[Nathan Woodrow]

Which platforms are we using that are proprietary?

GitHub is one but it's not a big deal as git is the built-in safety net.
Unlike SVN where the server could just packup shop and you are stuff.


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all.
> Our infrastructure, overly complex, is moving to several proprietary
> platforms. I'm
> not saying this is bad, and it certainly offers a number of advantages. We
> are all
> overstretched, and find difficult to maintain the many pieces we need.
> However, all this makes me a bit uncomfortable: I would like these choices
> would be
> more conscious, and we plan to have an exit strategy for each of the
> pieces.
> On the other hand, if we decide to trust e.g. GH, why not moving also the
> bug tracker
> there?
> All the best.
> - --
> Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
> www.faunalia.eu
> Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
> Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlFJWr0ACgkQ/NedwLUzIr4kfgCdGEdFqov2c7k8DhaT8ctax22a
> +7QAoLI2ruc5hwQdBNx2X+d8rOGYo7GU
> =mHVY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20130320/ae343248/attachment.html>