[Qgis-psc] Infrastructure

[Tim Sutton]

Hi

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Gary Sherman <gsherman at geoapt.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I agree.  If we said lets move to GitHub issue tracker I would not
>> complain.
>>
>
> How difficult will it be to migrate the current bugs to github---or do we
> just flush and start clean like the big boys do? :)
>
>
Now that is the best idea I have heard all year! It will be great to be
finally bug free!


Here is at least one other well lknown (to me anyway) project that has done
it:

http://blog.ushahidi.com/2012/02/08/were-moving-to-git-issues/

Regards

Tim


> -gary
>
>>
>> Paolo, it might be good to put together a document on what stuff we use,
>> where it lives, and who maintains it.  Like a inventory of sorts.
>>
>> - Nathan
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Otto Dassau <dassau at gbd-consult.de>wrote:
>>
>>> Am Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:05:34 +0100
>>> schrieb Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>:
>>>
>>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> > Hash: SHA1
>>> >
>>> > Il 20/03/2013 07:56, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
>>> >
>>> > > Maybe I am loosing some of my idealism of youth but I have been
>>> > > increasingly following the principle of 'best tool for the job,
>>> > > preferring FOSS wherever possible'.....this is something of a
>>> > > degradation of my 'FOSS or death' outlook, but it proprietary tools
>>> are
>>> > > needed to help us make our project better then so be it.
>>> > >
>>> > > On the subject of the github tracker - we use it for InaSAFE and I
>>> must
>>> > > say it is 1000000 times better than redmine / trac anything else -
>>> its
>>> > > really simple to use - its a personal failing but I hardly ever look
>>> in
>>> > > redmine because I find it so slow and klunky to work with.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks Tim for being frank (Frank?). Yes, that's my perception, and by
>>> > raising this point I'm trying to make this an explicit choice, rather
>>> than
>>> > a creeping feeling. Setting aside idealism, I think we should consider
>>> > real threats and opportunities, and going the appropriate way: if risks
>>> > are very low in the long term, let's simplify and move on; if not,
>>> let's
>>> > consolidate an alternative approach. Opinions?
>>> > All the best.
>>> > - --
>>> > Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
>>>
>>> +1 from me to select the 'best tool for the job' with a strong
>>> preference for
>>> open source - if possible. In the case of github and redmine I would also
>>> prefere to consolidate and use github tracker, if it is 1 Mio times
>>> better.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Otto
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
> Gary Sherman
> Chair, QGIS Project Steering Committee
> -Desktop GIS Book:
>  *http://desktopgisbook.com
> -Alaska Novel:
>  *http://alaskana.co
> -Geospatial Consulting & Hosting:
>  *http://geoapt.com
> "We work virtually everywhere"
> -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>


-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==============================================
Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming services
 * GeoDjango web development
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==============================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20130320/d72e4d57/attachment.html>