[Qgis-psc] Fwd: Re: [Qgis-developer] Minimum qt version - bumping to 4.6?

[Werner Macho]

As a non PSC Member I fully support Richard ..
Especially when it comes to pull requests ..

kind regards
Werner

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
<rdmailings at duif.net> wrote:
> On 18-11-13 13:50, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> Il 18/11/2013 10:04, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto:
>>
>>> IF it looks like certain deciscions are not taken because of too
>>> much 'democracy' in the community. I think the PSC should just make
>>> the decision AND maybe give action/tasks to people (because it is
>>> easier to ask for something then doing the actual action).
>>
>>> Also I think the community should be able to ask "hey PSC just take
>>> A conclusion".
>>
>> The problem is that the PSC has historically been (and currently is
>> even more) very slow in reacting. In fact, it is not clear which
>> questions should be dealtwith by the community, and which require a
>> PSC decision.
>
> As a fresh PSC member I've been suprised by the lack of (irc)-meetings
> during last months.
>
> Should we not just plan one per month, maybe at the same evening where
> some core-developers are available to go through some Pull Requests?
>
> I propose next Friday (22th) evening at .... 20:00?
>
> Some things we could put on the agenda:
>
> - Qt-version
> - new server + docker + building stuff
> - new release schema + next release
> - status of ... things
> - ... logo ?
> - decision structure Paolo
>
> If no one objects I see you on #QGIS next Friday.
> (this is working nice Paolo ;-) )
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Duivenvoorde
>
>