[Qgis-psc] Fwd: Re: [Qgis-developer] Minimum qt version - bumping to 4.6?

Richard Duivenvoorde rdmailings at duif.net
Mon Nov 18 05:10:17 PST 2013


On 18-11-13 13:50, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 18/11/2013 10:04, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto:
> 
>> IF it looks like certain deciscions are not taken because of too
>> much 'democracy' in the community. I think the PSC should just make
>> the decision AND maybe give action/tasks to people (because it is
>> easier to ask for something then doing the actual action).
> 
>> Also I think the community should be able to ask "hey PSC just take
>> A conclusion".
> 
> The problem is that the PSC has historically been (and currently is
> even more) very slow in reacting. In fact, it is not clear which
> questions should be dealtwith by the community, and which require a
> PSC decision.

As a fresh PSC member I've been suprised by the lack of (irc)-meetings
during last months.

Should we not just plan one per month, maybe at the same evening where
some core-developers are available to go through some Pull Requests?

I propose next Friday (22th) evening at .... 20:00?

Some things we could put on the agenda:

- Qt-version
- new server + docker + building stuff
- new release schema + next release
- status of ... things
- ... logo ?
- decision structure Paolo

If no one objects I see you on #QGIS next Friday.
(this is working nice Paolo ;-) )


Regards,

Richard Duivenvoorde





More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list