[Qgis-psc] [Qgis-developer] Resurrecting the RFC (QEP - QGIS Enhancement Proposal)

[Marco Hugentobler]

Hi Nyall

Having another process to nominate QEP voters sounds too complicated to me.

 >not everyone on the psc is a developer or has c++ coding experience

There is a mix of coders and non-coders in the PSC on purpose. 
Developers sometimes have a narrow point of view, so it is good that 
also non-developers have a say. In the discussion part of the QEP, the 
consequences for users can be mentioned. I don't consider that a 
problem, even for very technical subjects (and even those usually have 
somehow an influence on the users of a software).

I'm putting RFC/QEP on the agenda to discuss at the next PSC meeting 
(http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/PSC_Meeting_5_September_2014).

Regards,
Marco

On 23.08.2014 03:31, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
>
> On 23/08/2014 3:33 am, "Even Rouault" <even.rouault at spatialys.com 
> <mailto:even.rouault at spatialys.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Le vendredi 22 août 2014 17:19:34, Marco Hugentobler a écrit :
> > > - Who can vote?
> > >      PSC only (GDAL) / committers
> >
> > With GIT, 'committers' can be anyone. You probably meant folks who 
> have push
> > rights in official repo ? If you give them voting rights, and 
> potentially veto
> > right (not sure how the rules of the voting system of QGIS are), 
> then they are
> > defacto PSC members, since they can steer the direction of the 
> project. Not
> > saying this is bad. Just a consequence.
> >
>
> I'd say neither psc nor commit rights are a good fit. While I agree 
> that the psc should definitely have a say, not everyone on the psc is 
> a developer or has c++ coding experience. Similarly, we have people 
> who have commit rights who are neither developers nor psc members.
>
> Since a big part of the qep would be commenting on proposed technical 
> architecture, I think its fairly important that developers have a good 
> say in the process. But conversely if the qep process determines the 
> direction of QGIS, then non devs on the psc should also have a say.
>
> So, I'd say we need a new group for voters. We could have a process like:
> - a candidate is nominated & seconded (possibly by psc members only?)
> - the candidate gives a short reasoning on why they'd like to be part 
> of the group and what skills they have
> - after receiving a set number of votes the candidate is accepted into 
> the group. (Again, possibly only the psc could vote on candidates?).
>
> Nyall
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


-- 
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20140824/336aefed/attachment.html>