[Qgis-psc] QEP 1 - Final Draft

[Nathan Woodrow]

Hey Anita,

To make it fair all PSC members must vote. Because we have the condition
with the two -1 votes then we need everyones votes (well in the case of +7
then it's pretty clear which way it's going to go)

- Nathan

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:

> Looks pretty good to me, thanks Nathan!
>
> Just one question: is there a minimum number of PSC members who have
> to vote within the given 7 days?
>
> Best wishes,
> Anita
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hey PSC,
> >
> > I would like to formalize the QEP process outlined in QEP 1 so we can
> move
> > things along. I have made some updates tonight after talking to Tim about
> > his experience with using them other projects.
> >
> > The pull request can be found at
> > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/pull/4 and readable
> copy
> > at
> >
> https://github.com/NathanW2/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/blob/QEP_1/qep-1-purpose-and-format.rst
> >
> > I would really appreciate any feedback, mainly around the voting
> process.  I
> > have tried to flesh this out Tim and Nyall tonight to get some ideas and
> I
> > think we have come up with what should be fair.  As you will have the
> final
> > votes I would like to make sure you are happy with the process.
> >
> > I will update the QEP with any final comments and then do a final call
> for
> > voting to get it accepted.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nathan
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20141024/9bb196a6/attachment.html>