[Qgis-psc] PSC Meeting log from 8/4?

[Nyall Dawson]

On 13 Apr 2015 4:42 am, "Marco Hugentobler" <marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch>
wrote:
>
> Hi Nyall
>
>
>> I'm especially curious what "QGIS 3 (MH) [accepted]" means...
>
>
> There was no formal voting, however all meeting participants shared the
opinion that it is better to go for version 3 as soon as possible. That
means there will be no 2.10 and the next version is 3 (API breaks allowed).

Wow, this is huge news :) Were any additional details discussed? I'm
looking for clarification on a few points:

Is 3.0 going to be on the same schedule as 2.10 was planned to be (ie
freeze in 39 days), or will it be a "double-length" development period as
was discussed at some stage?

Will the minimum Qt version for QGIS 3.0 be bumped to 5.0? Will we switch
to PyQt5 too?

What about requiring c++11 compatible compilers?

Regards,
Nyall

>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
>
> Am 11.04.2015 um 11:01 schrieb Nyall Dawson:
>>
>> Hi PSC,
>>
>> Was a meeting held on the 8th of this month? If so, is anyone able to
>> upload a log of it to
>> http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/PSC_Meeting_8_April_2015 ?
>>
>> I'm especially curious what "QGIS 3 (MH) [accepted]" means...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nyall
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Marco Hugentobler
> Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
> marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
> Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20150413/0989a324/attachment.html>