[Qgis-psc] PSC Meeting log from 8/4?

[Anita Graser]

Hi Nyall,

I've posted my log - bit of the beginning missing -
http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/PSC_Meeting_8_April_2015

Here's the part on QGIS 3:

(3:51:39 PM) mhugent: So the question is how and when go for version 3
(3:51:58 PM) mhugent: E.g. QGIS3 after 2.10?
(3:52:16 PM) pcav: IMHO, since we have a LTR
(3:52:20 PM) pcav: we can go anytime
(3:52:25 PM) pcav: preferably soon
(3:52:38 PM) pcav: so people will have more safe time with the LTR
(3:52:42 PM) aneumann: Would 3.1 be another LTR then?
(3:52:52 PM) timlinux: yeah I also dont see much point in waiting till
after a 2.10
(3:53:12 PM) anitagraser: any time that works for you
(3:53:16 PM) timlinux: aneumann: yes
(3:53:24 PM) timlinux: 3.2
(3:53:26 PM) pcav: conservative peple can stay on 2.8 for 1 yr
(3:53:45 PM) pcav: and move to 3.2 after that
(3:53:48 PM) aneumann: it would be good to have something stable in Feb 2016
(3:54:15 PM) pcav: right, that's why I'm suggesting to move soon
(3:54:23 PM) pcav: to 3
(3:54:42 PM) mhugent: For me it is also the sooner the better.
(3:55:12 PM) mhugent: jef, what is your opinion (since you are the
release manager)?
(3:55:26 PM) aneumann: the question is if the ideas for the new API
are already ready/good enought to start with QGIS3?
(3:56:15 PM) aneumann: or maybe there are things to discuss before?
(3:56:47 PM) timlinux_
[~timlinux at 105-208-59-252.access.mtnbusiness.co.za] entered the room.
(3:56:57 PM) timlinux_: sorry folks I have to board my flight
(3:57:24 PM) jef: mhugent: I don't have strong opinions about version
numbers and api stability.   the api should never be turned inside out
and constantly changes anyway.
(3:57:38 PM) timlinux left the room (quit: Ping timeout: 246 seconds).
(3:57:38 PM) timlinux_: +1 from me to make the next release a jump to
3.0 but we need to hear from nyall
(3:57:52 PM) aneumann: Nyall told me that he can implement things in
parallel for the print composer - similar to symbology 1/2 or labeling
1/2
(3:57:53 PM) timlinux_: because he may have specific timelines
(3:57:53 PM) pcav: +1
(3:57:59 PM) timlinux_: ok
(3:58:01 PM) anitagraser: +1
(3:58:09 PM) timlinux_: ok folks I will catch up in the logs
(3:58:16 PM) timlinux_ left the room (quit: Remote host closed the connection).
(3:58:28 PM) dassau: +1
(3:58:30 PM) aneumann: but that was because he did not get any
feedback on when QGIS3 will be started
(3:58:45 PM) aneumann: Maybe he would prefer otherwise


Best wishes,
Anita


On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Marco Hugentobler <
marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch> wrote:

> Hi Nyall
>
>  I'm especially curious what "QGIS 3 (MH) [accepted]" means...
>>
>
> There was no formal voting, however all meeting participants shared the
> opinion that it is better to go for version 3 as soon as possible. That
> means there will be no 2.10 and the next version is 3 (API breaks allowed).
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
>
> Am 11.04.2015 um 11:01 schrieb Nyall Dawson:
>
>> Hi PSC,
>>
>> Was a meeting held on the 8th of this month? If so, is anyone able to
>> upload a log of it to
>> http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/PSC_Meeting_8_April_2015 ?
>>
>> I'm especially curious what "QGIS 3 (MH) [accepted]" means...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nyall
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Marco Hugentobler
> Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
> marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
> Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20150412/0483342d/attachment.html>