[Qgis-psc] QEP Vote: QEP #4 - LTR

[Radim Blazek]

+1 for QEP4, how easy if I don't have to do backports

>From what I read in psc meeting log [1], QGIS 2.8 is going to become
LTR without having allocated funds for bugfix backporting and without
strong policy requiring developers to do backports?

"Developers will be invited to backport bug fixes to the stable
branch" (QEP4 [2]) - is not sufficient IMO.

"16:59 < alexbruy> if we will have LTR, we can try to adapt GRASS
policy when developer that fixed bug should also backport it" [1] -
was left without comments.

Radim

[1] http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/wiki/PSC_Meeting_16_January_2015
[2] https://github.com/timlinux/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/blob/master/QEP-4-QGIS_Long_Term_Releases.rst


On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can we do a vote on the long term release QEP.
>>
>> QEP is at
>> https://github.com/timlinux/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/blob/master/QEP-4-QGIS_Long_Term_Releases.rst
>>
>> Vote on this mailing list.
>
>
> +1 for QEP4
>
> Best wishes,
> Anita
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc