[Qgis-psc] QEP process

Anita Graser anitagraser at gmx.at
Wed Oct 28 11:07:54 PDT 2015


Hi Nathan,

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com> wrote
​:​

> After watching the QEP process since it was created I will admit that
> using the Pull Request system wasn't the best solution and I'm not happy
> with it and the problems it causes.  It was confusing and just clunky, live
> and learn I guess.
> I have decided to use GitHub issues instead as it's a lot easier to edit
> and follow what is going on.  All the existing Pull Requests have been
> moved and authors assigned as the owners. Sorry if I missed anyone.
> Using issues should make things clearer on what is going on as you can see
> clearly what the QEP is about and the talk around it at the bottom.
> Hopefully everyone is happy with this move.
>

​+1​ I think this is a good step towards making the process easier. I have
to admit that I felt kind of overwhelmed whenever I tried to check and
contribute to the QEPs.

Best wishes,
Anita
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20151028/309b8d21/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list