[Qgis-psc] Moving the issue queue to github

[Luigi Pirelli]

-strk, login does not work
Luigi Pirelli

**************************************************************************************************
* Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
* GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
* Mastering QGIS:
https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis
**************************************************************************************************


On 7 April 2016 at 13:45, Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:48:39PM +0200, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>
>> But would make gh make finding relevant tickets easier?
>> So far I don't think it would.
>
> Maybe it would help to write a list of tipical queries to be run
> to find tickets. My attempt (non complete list, for obvious reasons):
>
>   - All unassigned blocker bugs in branch 2.8
>   - All unassigned crasher bugs in branch 2.14
>   - All bugs related to postgis provider
>   - All bugs targetted at being fixed in 2.14
>   - All feature requests with patch attached
>
> So far they all seem easy to find with a label-based approach.
> These might be harder (or maybe impossible, I don't know):
>
>   - Tickets with no indication of being bug or feature (to be triaged)
>   - Bugs not assigned to anybody
>   - Bugs with severity >= important
>
> I'd also argue that a fast response usually helps in finding relevant
> tickets, as well as automatic cross-reference between them. You know
> I'd rather see free software developers help improving availability of
> free software tools rather than just using proprietary services, but
> cannot pretend not to see the advantages of a centralized place where
> upstream bugs automatically get cross-referenced (even among projects).
>
> If only OSGeo itself could help with that cross-referencing, and using
> free software, I'd be happy again. Maybe it could just take some trac
> plugin but of course qgis would never move back to trac, even if it
> was improved. Or maybe it could be something more modern, like what
> I'm experimenting with https://tuscia.pallamondo.net (login with OSGeo
> credentials). But for sure the ideal federated cross-referencing (ping
> backs and such) are far from ready at the moment.
>
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc