[Qgis-psc] Moving the issue queue to github

[DelazJ]

 Hi,

Actually, I'm not sure that how filter reported issues using tags is what
we should care about first. To use tags, they should be filled with the
issue report. How will this be done and by who? eg, Who will add the Qgis
release concerned by the bug reported? who will set the category? ... Will
all reporters think to add these information in their description? Does it
ease their reports steps? And if not done, ...?
"Bref", considering this point, will moving to Github ease life for
developers and bug list cleaners?
I think these are some other daily points that need to be analyzed before
moving...

Harrissou

Envoyé depuis mon HTC

----- Reply message -----
De : "Sandro Santilli" <strk at keybit.net>
Pour : "Matthias Kuhn" <matthias at opengis.ch>
Cc : <qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Objet : [Qgis-psc] Moving the issue queue to github
Date : ven., avr. 8, 2016 22:27

On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 05:17:00PM +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 04:38 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

> > Also, I wasn't able to _search_ for
> > tickets w/out labels (which would be needed for triaging).
>
> You didn't try, did you ? ;)

Not hard enough

> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/labels/Text
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3AText+-label%3Aenhancement+

None of the above return tickets with _no_ labels.
Anyway, no:label seems to do it.

--strk;
_______________________________________________
Qgis-psc mailing
listQgis-psc at lists.osgeo.orghttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20160411/e9e314fa/attachment.html>