[Qgis-psc] Blog post for trusted plugins

[Tim Sutton]

Hi

> On 18 Aug 2016, at 10:29 PM, DelazJ <delazj at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Thanks for your inputs, Paolo. And sorry my comment isn't directly about your text.
> 
> I read some comment in the past asking for the use of "Trusted author" syntax instead of just "Trusted" (which implicitly is applied to the plugin - and is explicitly applied to it in the plugin manager given that one reads "This plugin is trusted"). 
> 
> Would/could that also be updated? I think it's more coherent with the explanation in the article given that it better emphasizes the idea that it's not the plugin which is not trustworthy but its author who doesn't have same recognition in QGIS ecosystem. 
> 
> Does it sound reasonable and coherent as changes, to you?

+1 I think that would be a very good idea!

Regards

Tim



---

Tim Sutton
QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair
tim at qgis.org




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20160818/dc9e2796/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: qgis_icon.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4642 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20160818/dc9e2796/attachment.jpg>