[Qgis-psc] Draft announcement re 3.0

[Nathan Woodrow]

I think in the end the best thing is we now have a plan and can move
forward. There is never going to be a perfect way to do this so just pick
one way and commit.

Thanks to the PSC for sorting it out.

- Nathan

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On 10 Feb 2016 7:32 PM, "Tim Sutton"
> >
> >
> > Lets defer the decision to Jürgen, as release manager (and the guy at
> the coal face of building lots of packages) the call should be his.
>
> Btw, I think given that I've been very vocal and outspoken regarding 3.0,
> that I should say for the record that I respect this decision. It may not
> be be exactly the outcome I would have preferred, but - you ARE the PSC,
> and we've entrusted you to run the project in the best way possible.
> There's not a single PSC member who I don't individually have a great deal
> of respect and gratitude toward, and I think that considering all the
> different difficult factors involved here that this plan is a good
> compromise.
>
> So, thank you PSC. Thanks for keeping the peace and persevering through
> what's sure to have been a challenging and difficult time.
>
> Nyall
>
>
>
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >>
> >> --strk;
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-psc mailing list
> >> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Tim Sutton
> > QGIS Project Steering Committee Member
> > tim at qgis.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20160210/b6210280/attachment.html>