[Qgis-psc] Which version should be LT?

[Luigi Pirelli]

2.16.x can be used as testing board to backport fixes to the 2.14 LTR
Luigi Pirelli

**************************************************************************************************
* Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
* GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
* Mastering QGIS:
https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis
**************************************************************************************************


On 28 January 2016 at 16:28, Neumann, Andreas <a.neumann at carto.net> wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> On 2016-01-28 16:21, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Thu, 28. Jan 2016 at 16:19:10 +0100, Neumann, Andreas wrote:
>
> Yesterday - at the QGIS-CH user group meeting there was a discussion -
> if we decide to release 2.16 - if we shouldn't make 2.16 the LT release.
>
>
> s/shouldn't/should/?
>
>
>
> it's a question of perspective ;-)
>
> There was consens among the Swiss users, that they would prefer to end the
> 2.x release cycle with a LT release - they don't care so much about the
> yearly cycle for the LT release - in this special case of migrating to 3.0.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc