[Qgis-psc] Which version should be LT?
Luigi Pirelli
luipir at gmail.com
Thu Jan 28 08:45:04 PST 2016
I understand you point, but IMHO "latest features" and LT are oxymoron
Luigi Pirelli
**************************************************************************************************
* Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
* GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
* Mastering QGIS:
https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis
**************************************************************************************************
On 28 January 2016 at 17:17, Neumann, Andreas <a.neumann at carto.net> wrote:
> On 2016-01-28 16:36, Luigi Pirelli wrote:
>
> 2.16.x can be used as testing board to backport fixes to the 2.14 LTR
> Luigi Pirelli
>
>
>
> hm - but users want the LT with the latest features - not just fixes - in
> this special situation where we can expect a delay/maturity phase for 3.0
>
>
>
> Is there a particular reason why 2.14 has to be LT - other than the yearly
> cycle?
>
> Andreas
More information about the Qgis-psc
mailing list