[Qgis-psc] QGIS 2.16 sponsored bugfixing report

[Neumann, Andreas]

Hi, 

Perhaps Giovannis job shouldn't be concentrating on the management of
the bug system (I think the devs can do it quite well themselves), but
to assist in making sure the bug can be reproduced and all the necessary
information is in the bug report. Bugs that can't be reproduced or lack
useful feedback could then be invalidated or labelled as such by
Giovanni. This would save the devs a lot of time and I remember this is
what Martin Dobias also requested. 

Andreas 

On 2016-06-21 10:33, Matthias Kuhn wrote:

> Hi Giovanni,
> 
> On 06/21/2016 10:06 AM, Giovanni Manghi wrote: 
> 
>> Are the rest of "severe/regression" being tackled in the paid effort?
>> There are 31 issues in this short list, a few of them pretty serious.
> 
> Can you give us a short list of what is most important (I'm not sure
> that a bug for deprecated fTools is severe)?
> I have some time left.
> 
> Best
> Matthias
> 
>> cheers!
>> 
>> -- G --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20160621/1e54d2fc/attachment.html>