[Qgis-psc] Plugin management: one step forward

[DelazJ]

Hi,
Thanks to all and Paolo for his summary

What about a "recommended" tag  instead of "trusted"? Though not used, I
fear that user may considere others as "untrusted" and some do not deserve
this.

Unless "most downloaded" is considered by release, I'm not sure it is
significant. Some plugins are often released due to new features but also
because not heavily tested before release. We can end up with a new release
per month meaning that all downloads number can exceed a single but heavily
tested release plugin downloads (while none of its versions reaches the
single released plugin downloads).

That said, what is actually behind the "Featured" tag? I remember a
discussion about this term but can't find it nor recall what was the answer.

Regards,
Harrissou

2016-05-27 19:58 GMT+02:00 Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at>:

> Thank you everyone for the discussion and Paolo for summing it up!
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
> wrote:
>>
>> > ** Plugin website: make a better use of the tag "Featured", involving
>> > the community to select the ones to include, and keep the list dynamic
>> > and updated
>
>
> ​Do you have an idea yet how this community involvement could look like?
> Maybe something active, or more "voting with your feet" i.e. "most
> downloaded" are probably good candidates for "featured" but also really
> great newcomers should be "featured".
>
> Best wishes,
> Anita
>
> ​
>
>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20160527/9e94b9a8/attachment.html>