[Qgis-psc] Selection of successful QGIS grant applications

[Nyall Dawson]

On 21 April 2017 at 07:47, Tim Sutton <tim at qgis.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Larry
>
>
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 7:24 PM, Larry Shaffer <larrys at dakotacarto.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim and PSC,
>
> Is the a reason normal cumulative weighting of the votes was not used instead of the per-level exclusionary approach?
>
> Attached are the tally results when done in a cumulative manner, which I think is a fairer representation of one's vote and reflection upon each project's overall importance, when compared to the current method. Note the very different results, though the top projects are still fairly similar.
>
>
> Thanks that makes much better sense - I have updated the spreadsheet summary tab accordingly. As you say the outcome for the top 5 items is the same (though their sequence changes) - I will follow your approach for future grant votes.
>

Fantastic work Tim + PSC, this is all very exciting to see!

Inevitable question - if the processing documentation work gets funded
through the documentation budget, does that mean the (much needed) OSX
packaging work would squeeze in?

Nyall