[Qgis-psc] Requiring adequate plugin descriptions

Anita Graser anitagraser at gmx.at
Tue May 23 11:00:41 PDT 2017


On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:

> Il 23/05/2017 18:17, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> > Hi All
> >
> > +1 for requesting people to use QgsNetworkAccessManager
>
> agreed - Richard, would you mindadding your note to the instructions?
>
> > your other replies. I guess to start we could just check the
> > descriptions manually when plugins are submitted and toss it back to the
> > author if they are not adequate.
>
> I can take care of this manually, if we agree on making it a requirement.
>

​+1 this will be good for our users and should also give us a better
overview of the type of tools that are converted to v3.

Best wishes,
Anita


​




>
> all the best.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20170523/d3e75d25/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list