[Qgis-psc] Supporting a permanent performance testing infrastructure for QGIS server

[Régis Haubourg]

Hi all,
good news following the FOSS4G FR event !

Our customer validates the work to bootstrap the performance benchmark
infrastructure :)

We'll update things soon to discuss technical details on the developper's
list and go back to the PSC when the need for a dedicated server will
occur.

Best regards

Régis



2018-05-06 10:12 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>:

> Hi Régis,
>
> Il 04/05/2018 16:58, Régis Haubourg ha scritto:
> > - Directly fund that on behalf of QGIS.org
> > - Oslandia funds that directly and we deal the equivalent sponsorship
> level. It could probably be something like Silver
> > or above depending how much support and maintenance we provide for
> adding new tests.
> >
> >
> > We don't think grant applications are fitted for long term funding, but
> depending on the interest we could apply for a
> > grant that would improve the performance logging status in QGIS and add
> some critical test cases (like provider
> > comparison for instance)
> >
> > How does the PSC feels with that proposal ?
> my personal feeling is that we should better avoid taking directly over
> project shoulders long term infrastructural commitments. I'd be more
> inclined of accepting this as a sponsorization by power users or
> interested parties.
>
> All the best, and thanks.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180517/901d33e7/attachment.html>