[Qgis-psc] Notes about certification

[Régis Haubourg]

Hi all,
I'm afraid we didn't reach to a consensus yet.
I really feel uncomfortable with focusing only on releasing training
materials as a the only way to get a clearance for being certified.

Just a quick example, at Oslandia, we don't have any common material yet.
Each trainer creates it - when we create some - very precisely for each
customer. It is sometimes only a markdown file, and we built them on the
fly with the customers.
The idea is not to discuss if it's a good idea or not, some customers ask
for materials, some are happy with that tailor made solution.
But if we would like to be certified in the normal process, I'm afraid we
would juste push some bad quality material somewhere.
Would that be a progress for QGIS project with such noisy situation of
materials around ?
That is why I suggested we can focus on any other contribution made by the
applicant. One very valid contribution would be improving the existing
materials, and we should encourage that one first for new contributers.

I think this explains the lack of feeback here.

Best regards,
Régis



Le lun. 8 oct. 2018 à 17:19, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it> a
écrit :

> Sorry to insist, I'd like to have a clear procedure. Should we start a
> vote, or we can agree on this proposal?
>
> All the best.
>
>
> Il 10/02/2018 09:40 AM, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > Il 09/15/2018 02:20 PM, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
> >> A possible solution would be:
> >> * require to submit the training material to the committee for
> >> evaluation, which is a critical step in acceptance
> >> * suggest to submit in a source, text form (rst or md) following our
> >> documentation style, if possible
> >> * require an explicit licence for the material, suggesting a CC-BY-SA
> >> whenever possible.
> >>
> >>
> > do we agree on this?
> > All the best.
> >
>
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS.ORG Chair:
> http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20181008/19bf3ef1/attachment.html>