[Qgis-psc] again about the bug tracker

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi, 

Actually, the PSC could still decide that this is an important project
that needs to be financed outside of the QGIS grants. We can do that. No
problem. 

However, if I remember the discussions in Madeira, there were no clear
plans around and who would do what. The grant proposal was meant to
provide more  

Now, if I understand Denis, he suggests to have everything in github,
while many others would favour gitlab (but it would be a lot of work to
migrate things). 

So, the PSC needs to have a clear proposal (without loosing a whole lot
of issue history) and then probably a vote from the core devs, to move
on with this. And whether to go with github or gitlab. 

Andreas 

On 2018-10-10 16:09, Régis Haubourg wrote:

> Hi, 
> 
> the reason was the community vote.. As always, votes mainly focus on features or tasks that touch users directly. 
> 
> Cheers 
> 
> Régis 
> On 10/10/2018 16:07, Luigi Pirelli wrote: 
> ouch! I didn't know anything about declined grant to move to GitLab... what was the reasons? 
> 
> Luigi Pirelli
> 
> **************************************************************************************************
> * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
> * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
> * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
> * Mastering QGIS 2nd Edition:
> * https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/mastering-qgis-second-edition
> * Hire me: http://goo.gl/BYRQKg
> ************************************************************************************************** 
> 
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 15:32, Denis Rouzaud <denis.rouzaud at gmail.com> wrote: 
> Hi PSC, 
> 
> The last issue about Redmine not sending mail makes me write again about the topic. 
> 
> I'd like to propose to change direction from the decision which has been taken in Madeira about moving to Gitlab. 
> 
> I'ts been roughly half a year and nothing moved except for a declined grant proposal. 
> 
> I have heard something from Steven Feldman at the FOSS4G which rang a bell. I don't recall the exact formulation nor my phrasing is as precise but he advised to be pragmatic and to avoid losing too much energy on ethical or not-strictly-related-to-the-topic issues...and to me, we're looking at something (Gitlab) which represents weeks of development just for the CI and which barely bring anything valuable over Github while we stick to a non satisfying solution (Redmine). 
> 
> I would not deny that ethical is important...but what/who are working for? 
> 
> Best wishes, 
> Denis 
> -- 
> 
> Denis Rouzaud
> denis at opengis.ch 
> +41 76 370 21 22 [1] 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

-- 
Open Source GIS Expert / Water management 

mail: regis.haubourg at oslandia.com 
tél: 0033 184 257 870 [2]
---------------------------------
http://oslandia.com/

OSLANDIA IS AN INNOVATIVE COMPANY SPECIALIZED IN GIS ARCHITECTURE. WE
PROVIDE SERVICE ON OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE FOR WHICH WE ARE EDITORS OR
RECOGNIZED EXPERTS.

_______________________________________________
Qgis-psc mailing list
Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc 

 

Links:
------
[1] http://kolabnow.com/./#NOP
[2] sip:0033184257870
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20181010/3013499a/attachment.html>