[Qgis-psc] Feature freeze extension request

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi,

I am fine with the feature freeze exception for these three major changes
only - if the core devs who can assess this matter are confident that this
work can be finished in the coming week - and that these changes will not
have any major negative impacts on the rest of QGIS.

Thanks and greetings,
Andreas

On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 09:44, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it> wrote:

> Thanks Alessandro for clarifying.
> Opinions?
> Cheers.
>
> On 30/08/19 10:00, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
> > Yes, sorry for being short, I am on holiday with mobile phone only.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019, 09:14 Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it
> > <mailto:cavallini at faunalia.it>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Alessandro,
> >
> >     On 30/08/19 07:55, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
> >     > +1 for all three PRs
> >
> >     you mean you're in favour of extending freeze by a week to allow
> review
> >     and merge of these 3 PRs?
> >     Cheers.
> >
> >     > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019, 00:58 Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
> >     > <mailto:nyall.dawson at gmail.com <mailto:nyall.dawson at gmail.com>>>
> >     wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 08:54, Denis Rouzaud
> >     <denis.rouzaud at gmail.com <mailto:denis.rouzaud at gmail.com>
> >     >     <mailto:denis.rouzaud at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:denis.rouzaud at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     > I would like therefore to ask for a one week extension for
> both
> >     >     the core refactoring and the new feature (logarithmic method).
> >     >     >
> >     >
> >     >     I think this same exception could/should apply to some other
> open
> >     >     work. In particular I have in mind Hugo's selective masking
> work
> >     >     (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/30747) and the snapping
> cache
> >     >     changes (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/31374). Both PRs
> >     have been
> >     >     in place for a number of weeks, both are VERY critical changes
> >     which
> >     >     must not be rushed due to the potential impact of regressions
> >     in these
> >     >     code areas.
> >     >
> >     >     I'd much prefer to see an extra week spent on these PRs vs
> >     having them
> >     >     rush merged today to avoid the freeze deadline.
> >     >
> >     >     Nyall
> >     >     _______________________________________________
> >     >     Qgis-psc mailing list
> >     >     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> >     <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>>
> >     >     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > Qgis-psc mailing list
> >     > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> >     > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >     >
> >
> >     --
> >     Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu <http://www.faunalia.eu>
> >     QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> Chair:
> >     http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Qgis-psc mailing list
> >     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> >     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >
>
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS.ORG Chair:
> http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc



-- 

--
Andreas Neumann
QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20190831/d0c0f0d2/attachment.html>