[Qgis-psc] Two recent proposals - how to finalize?

[Marco Bernasocchi]

On 12.12.19 15:52, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> OK, so do we agree in having just one resolutions.rst per year?
> Once decided it's easy to merge all.

If by that you mean, do all the work on the Github PSC repo and end of
the year create a merged rst file, then yes. If not well all my points
are already in the mail below :)

ciao

Marco

> Cheers.
>
> Il 12/12/19 15:48, Marco Bernasocchi ha scritto:
>> Hi Harissou I completely agree with you.
>> That is why I suggested to do all in the same place on the github PSC
>> repo. basically a centralised place where we see all things the PSC
>> deals with and votes are noted as votes with proper labels. we get
>> search, discussian and centralisation.
>>
>> on the website we can then link the decisions that were taken and even
>> sort them by year and so on.
>>
>> We could also have a separate repo just for resolutions. but I think all
>> together with labels is better for us in the PSC so we don't loose track
>> of what has to be done due to too many places to look into.
>>
>> and before it is made an argument, we can if we want download all our
>> data we can do so simply.
>>
>> https://github.blog/2018-12-19-download-your-data/
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Marco
>>
>> On 12.12.19 15:38, DelazJ wrote:
>>>
>>> Le jeu. 12 déc. 2019 à 12:52, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it
>>> <mailto:cavallini at faunalia.it>> a écrit :
>>>
>>>     Hi Harissou,
>>>     thanks for letting me know.
>>>
>>>     Il 12/12/19 12:43, DelazJ ha scritto:
>>>
>>>     > Paolo, the qgis website build is broken now because files are not
>>>     > referenced in the index ;(
>>>     >
>>>     > And each rst file will result in a page if built. What about
>>>     adding the
>>>     > resolutions in a single file, the most recent on top the older? All
>>>     > decisions in one page on the website.
>>>
>>>     I would prefer to have them separate, as it is easier to have the
>>>     general picture even for the casual visitor.
>>>
>>> If I may, as an end user, I'd find easier to go to a page and be able
>>> to read (or search through) all the decisions that were taken than
>>> clicking tens of files/pages to get the history (assuming that page
>>> title (aka file name?) are sufficiently meaningful). Right now there
>>> are 4 files, they could be tens in few months. And in few years? I'm
>>> definitely not convinced that one file by decision is the right and
>>> simpler way to document these. /A minima/, maybe a file a year.
>>> Note that at the top of a page, it's possible to have a table of
>>> content that would appropriately point to a section within the page.
>>> See how docs pages are displayed.
>>>
>>> And from a practical point of view for psc members, whenever you add a
>>> file, you'd need to mention it in an index file to have it correctly
>>> build. Not sure it's simpler than copy-paste-modify a section/template
>>> within the same file.
>>>
>>> Just trying to provide some food for thought...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Harrissou
>>>
>>>     This is a first attempt, I have no problem in finding a different
>>>     solution. I'd like something simple, where a PSC member can just
>>>     dump a
>>>     text file in a dir and it gets listed and rendered without further
>>>     intervention.
>>>     Any suggestion?
>>>     Cheers.
>>>     -- 
>>>     Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu <http://www.faunalia.eu>
>>>     QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> Chair:
>>>     http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>> -- 
>> Marco Bernasocchi
>>
>> QGIS.org Co-chair
>> http://berna.io
>>
-- 
Marco Bernasocchi

QGIS.org Co-chair
http://berna.io