[Qgis-psc] PyQgis Cookbook revision
Alessandro Pasotti
apasotti at gmail.com
Thu Dec 19 06:37:49 PST 2019
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:59 AM Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:
> OK, if it's a quick thing then please submit a proposal and we'll vote
> it ASAP.
> Thanks.
>
I've done a quick research, the current cookbook situation appears to be:
- python code samples/snippets: 202
- python code samples/snippets currently tested: 53
So, I think that the plan would be to:
1. check all the cookbook text for 3.10 API changes and update it
accordingly
2. put the 149 untested snippets under test
As far as point 1 is concerned the following files have the 'outofdate'
directive:
./source/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/server.rst
./source/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/settings.rst
./source/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/network_analysis.rst
./source/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/canvas.rst
./source/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/authentication.rst
./source/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/plugins/ide_debugging.rst
./source/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/plugins/pluginlayer.rst
./source/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/plugins/releasing.rst
./source/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/raster.rst
this of course doesn't mean that all others are necessarily uptodate,
but we can assume that they require less work to be updated.
It's a bit difficult to estimate the exact amount of work required to
achieve
both tasks, especially because some code samples will require quite a lot
of setup and data in order to run in the automatic tests.
However, I think the most efficient way to proceed is to work on both
tasks simultaneously: while checking the code samples it will be easier
to also apply corrections to the text.
So, what I would like to propose is to start with 5 days of work and see
where we
can get with that, there are probably some APIs that haven't changed much
between releases (authentication is an example).
Btw, when looking at this, I've added this small improvement:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/4651
Cheers
> Il 18/12/19 08:57, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:54 AM Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it
> > <mailto:cavallini at faunalia.it>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ale,
> > would this be suitable for a grant project?
> >
> >
> >
> > You tell me :)
> >
> > I thought I would have time to do it now in the next few weeks, but if I
> > will still have time later in the year I will apply for a grant.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > Il 18/12/19 08:50, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like like to make a deep revision and update of the cookbook
> > and put
> > > code snippets under automated testing.
> > >
> > > Are there any funds left for such activity?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alessandro Pasotti
> > > w3: www.itopen.it <http://www.itopen.it> <http://www.itopen.it>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu <http://www.faunalia.eu>
> > QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> Chair:
> > http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alessandro Pasotti
> > w3: www.itopen.it <http://www.itopen.it>
>
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS.ORG Chair:
> http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
>
--
Alessandro Pasotti
w3: www.itopen.it
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20191219/e582a6f4/attachment.html>
More information about the Qgis-psc
mailing list