[Qgis-psc] Review responses to quesstionnaire from Steve Feldman

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi Marco,

Thanks for your review. I changed the wording to:

"The non-LT versions deliver new features at an earlier stage and are meant
for early adopters who accept that they use a less-tested and potentially
less stable version than the LT releases.".

Andreas

On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 08:56, Marco Bernasocchi <marco at qgis.org> wrote:

> hi Andreas thanks a lot!
>
> just one small point:
> "The non LT versions are meant to be used by more adventurous users who
> do not mind occasional problems and feel ok living on the cutting edge of
> new software."
>
> seems that non LT are beta kind of things, to mee non lt is more about
> early availability of features and fixes
>
> cheers
> Marco
>
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, 11:42 Andreas Neumann, <andreas at qgis.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Steve Feldman, as part of his investigations on FOSSGIS software
>> project/product management (results to be presented at FOSS4G in Bukarest),
>> sent me some additional questions:
>>
>> I drafted responses, but need your review, comments, help to fill in the
>> gaps:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M8GVsoIFK1IhbO0N_T2Z9e-cVvhTaO5yofGf5Q14-2s/edit
>>
>> Hope I managed to summarize our situation correctly, if not, feel free to
>> change/edit/correct.
>>
>> Thanks for your help,
>> Andreas
>>
>> --
>> Andreas Neumann
>> QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>

-- 

--
Andreas Neumann
QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20190624/fa69c49d/attachment.html>