[Qgis-psc] 2019 grant voting is closed

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi Paolo, 

No offense here, Paolo. But I don't share your interpretation. I don't
think that people deliberately preferred cheaper items over more
expensive ones here. This outcome is by pure chance and not funded on
the fact that people picked cheaper items over more expensive ones. 

Also - wise spending has nothing to do with how expensive a proposal is.


My interpretation of the results are: 

- the two server improvement proposals did not attract enough votes,
because still a lot of users (voters in this case) don't use QGIS server


- the two registry proposals maybe sounded too abstract to some voters
and they perhaps didn't immediately see benefit to them (if they are not
core devs). Such "house keeping" (code cleanup) proposals generally have
a harder time attracting voters compared to the ones where they think
they have an immediate benefit as an end users. 

But since all of the proposals are valuable contributions, I agree, it
is a wise choice ;-) 

Andreas 

On 2019-06-26 05:29, Paolo Cavallini wrote:

> Hi Anita,
> I checked, looks good, thanks!
> Interestingly rank is inversely correlated with cost. My interpretation
> is that voters mind about spending wisely our limited resources, which
> is a good sign IMHO.
> Cheers.
> 
> On 25/06/19 23:02, Tim Sutton wrote: Hi Anita
> 
> All looks good to me.- thanks for doing this!
> 
> Regards
> 
> Tim
> 
> On 25 Jun 2019, at 19:11, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at
> <mailto:anitagraser at gmx.at>> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The grant voting is finished. We received 31 votes from 16 community
> representatives and 15 user group representatives. 
> 
> I've run the numbers to determine the successful proposals but I think
> we should have at least two more PSC members cross checking the
> results before publishing them:
> 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1f6eAOW8XyxIfuQA1JF5qR1TinDQugofOrNoPJpY-ZUo/edit?usp=sharing 
> 
> Please have a look and let me know if you confirm. My plan would be to
> announce the successful proposals on Sunday 30th June. 
> 
> Regards,
> Anita
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc 
> --
> 
> *Tim Sutton*
> 
> *Co-founder:* Kartoza
> *Ex Project chair:* QGIS.org <http://QGIS.org>
> 
> Visit http://kartoza.com <http://kartoza.com/> to find out about open
> source:
> 
> Desktop GIS programming services
> Geospatial web development
> GIS Training
> Consulting Services
> 
> *Skype*: timlinux 
> *IRC:* timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net <http://freenode.net>
> 
> I'd love to connect. Here's my calendar link
> <https://calendly.com/timlinux> to make finding time easy.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20190626/35506258/attachment.html>