[Qgis-psc] [QGIS-Developer] Environmental policy
Alessandro Pasotti
apasotti at gmail.com
Thu Jan 16 03:52:54 PST 2020
Hi Paolo,
thank you for bringing this on.
Here is my very personal opinion:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:20 PM Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:
> Hi all,
> following the interesting proposal by Andreas, I'm here starting a
> discussion about QGIS.ORG environmental policy:
>
> * do we need an explicit environmental policy?
>
yes
* probably our greatest impact is travel for Developers Meetings
> * do we need in person general meetings, or we can promote more
> extensive and structured use of remote connections?
>
we do need in person meetings
* if we need it, do we need two meetings per year?
>
ideally, yes
* do we want to plan our meetings in an optimal location, to minimize
> total travel?
>
yes
* do we want a combination between the two: smaller local meetings
> that reduce travel, coordinated across the globe?
>
no
* do we want to suggest|gently push|require participants to use low
> impact transportation?
>
gently push
* do we want a cap on cost and time difference between transportation
> method? e.g. train is to be used when cost or duration are no more than
> x times flight cost or duration
>
no
> * do we want to engage in proactive environmental actions? e.g. donating
> to the environmental agencies|NGOs|etc. specific tools to evaluate and
> reduce impact? e.g. a QGIS ad hoc grant with a specific budget for it
>
not sure
* do we want additional actions? e.g. low impact (vegan) diet on Dev
> Meetings?
>
maybe vegetarian
I know it's just a dream and it won't go anywhere but I would add an item
to the list: prohibit the use of QGIS to the fossil-fuels industry.
It would be a strong message btw.
--
Alessandro Pasotti
w3: www.itopen.it
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200116/52a7ace8/attachment.html>
More information about the Qgis-psc
mailing list