[Qgis-psc] Voting for grants

Nyall Dawson nyall.dawson at gmail.com
Thu Jun 4 16:21:26 PDT 2020


On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 22:23, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We discussed this issue in this week's PSC meeting and have come to the
> following decision:
>
> Instead of using the old system of ranked voting for top 6 proposals (6
> points to the highest ranked to 1 point to the lowest ranked), this year
> each voting member will be asked to select his/her favorite 6 proposals
> and each of these proposals gets 1 point.
>
> Concerning ideas to limit who can vote on which proposal (e.g. no voting
> on proposals by "own company"), we have decided against implementing any
> such rules. The reasoning follows many of the concerns raised in this
> tread: it is highly complicated to define who gets to vote on what and
> this could be a potentially big source of conflict every year.
> Furthermore, the PSC thinks that what we have seen so far shows that
> voting members can be trusted to vote in the best interests of the QGIS
> project.
>

Just wanted to publicly extend my thanks to PSC for the quick, clear,
and decisive actions taken on all the issues raised regarding the
grant process.

Great work team!

Nyall


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list