[Qgis-psc] Voting for grants

[Marco Bernasocchi]

Thanks a lot Nyall and Régis, we try our best.

Cheers

Marco

On 05.06.20 08:44, Régis Haubourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> totally agreed with Nyall here. Thanks a lot !
>
> Régis
>
> On 05/06/2020 01:21, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 22:23, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We discussed this issue in this week's PSC meeting and have come to the
>>> following decision:
>>>
>>> Instead of using the old system of ranked voting for top 6 proposals (6
>>> points to the highest ranked to 1 point to the lowest ranked), this year
>>> each voting member will be asked to select his/her favorite 6 proposals
>>> and each of these proposals gets 1 point.
>>>
>>> Concerning ideas to limit who can vote on which proposal (e.g. no voting
>>> on proposals by "own company"), we have decided against implementing any
>>> such rules. The reasoning follows many of the concerns raised in this
>>> tread: it is highly complicated to define who gets to vote on what and
>>> this could be a potentially big source of conflict every year.
>>> Furthermore, the PSC thinks that what we have seen so far shows that
>>> voting members can be trusted to vote in the best interests of the QGIS
>>> project.
>>>
>> Just wanted to publicly extend my thanks to PSC for the quick, clear,
>> and decisive actions taken on all the issues raised regarding the
>> grant process.
>>
>> Great work team!
>>
>> Nyall
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

-- 
Marco Bernasocchi

QGIS.org Chair
http://berna.io