[Qgis-psc] Formal request to extend LTR life span to two years

Tim Sutton tim at kartoza.com
Sun Mar 1 22:49:31 PST 2020


Hi

> On 2 Mar 2020, at 06:46, Matthias Kuhn <matthias at opengis.ch> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> May I re-raise my proposal to start a poll on how LTR's are actually used to get an understanding of our users.
> 
> Wouldn't it be nice to not only help our users to focus on data -- but also have data for our own decision making too?

If you / we come up with a nice set of questions for the poll, we can add a link to it in the QGIS feed - apparently posting stuff there does have a big impact.

Regards

Tim


> 
> 
>> For reference, I planned to trigger a survey to get a better idea of our users later this year which could help us having a better decision base regarding release management. I thought to push this forward in summer (when people have experience in migrating from 3.4 to 3.10 and we don't have many effects from a 2 to 3 upgrade in the stats anymore), but we can as well do it sooner.
>> 
>> 
>> - Which QGIS version are you currently using (3.4, 3.10, another LR)
>> 
>> - How often do you upgrade patch versions (monthly, sometimes, never)
>> 
>> - When do you plan to upgrade to the next version
>> 
>> - Size of organisation / installations
>> 
>> - What is the main reason for not upgrading patch releases more often (Why should I if everyting just works; Internal testing takes too long; Internal application deployment is complicated/expensive; I already update every patch release; Patch releases tend to break things; I didn't know there are patch releases; Other)
>> 
>> - What is the main reason for not upgrading the main QGIS version earlier (Internal testing takes time; Never change a running system - I do not trust new releases; Plugins are incompatible; I always wait for x patch releases before upgrading out of habit; Other)
>> 
>> - In an ideal world, how often would you prefer to have new LTR versions (1y, 2y, 5y, I use every release regardless if LTR or not)
>> 
>> - Do you have a support agreement with a core developer / company to fix blocker issues before upgrading
>> 
>> 
>> Feedback on it very welcome.
> 
> Matthias
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

—









Tim Sutton

Co-founder: Kartoza
Ex Project chair: QGIS.org

Visit http://kartoza.com <http://kartoza.com/> to find out about open source:

Desktop GIS programming services
Geospatial web development
GIS Training
Consulting Services

Skype: timlinux 
IRC: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net

I'd love to connect. Here's my calendar link <https://calendly.com/timlinux> to make finding time easy.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200302/8c0e302c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: KartozaNewLogoThumbnail.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6122 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200302/8c0e302c/attachment.jpg>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list